An LLM guesses.LexIQ knows.
Practice management for Malaysian litigation firms. Every answer cited. No authority, no answer.
Because every answer traces to an authority your firm verified, and every date traces to a rule a practitioner checked against the statute.
Built for the corridor outside Court 4
Try it. Lightly.
A working slice of the product. Click anything.
Illustrative · sample data · the real product runs on your firm's own corpus
Zero hallucination is an architecture
Most legal AI asks a general-purpose model to be careful. LexIQ removes the opportunity to be wrong.
Answers come from your corpus
Retrieval scores the firm's verified authorities and keeps the strong matches. The model is constrained to cite those and nothing else.
No authority, no answer
If nothing clears the threshold the request is refused before any model call is made. The lawyer is told plainly that the corpus holds nothing on point.
A human gate before court
Filing requires an explicit verification tick, and every AI-assisted output carries a disclosure marker that cannot be switched off.
The whole matter, one system
Built for Malaysian litigation firms of roughly ten to fifty lawyers, and mobile-first because the work happens in court.
Matters
Civil and criminal, grouped by urgency. In custody first.
Deadlines
Rule-derived dates, with gaps shown rather than estimated.
Hearings
A month view of deadlines, hearings and notes, scoped to your access.
Documents
Matter, folder, file. AI pre-classifies and a person confirms.
Conflicts and KYC
Run at intake and recorded against the matter.
Time and costs
Captured against matters, with per-user rates feeding the cost engine.
Revenue
Billable-hours earnings across the firm, for managing partners.
Bundles
ROC-form sections, legal descriptions, an editable Word file.
Audit
An immutable log of access and change, tied to matters and users.
Data breaches
PDPA-aligned detection, severity assessment and a 72-hour clock.
Notifications
Escalation to the people who must act, with a breach-notify route.
Client portal
Their documents and messages. Never the internal folder.
Five modes. One rule.
The model arranges verified material. It never invents law.
Correspondence and cause papers in your firm's own voice.
- House style learned from a precedent you upload
- Court documents follow Malaysian cause-paper structure
- Time logged against the matter as you work
Cited, or refused. There is no third outcome.
- Scored retrieval over the firm's verified corpus
- Hard refusal when nothing clears the threshold
- Citations restricted to the authorities retrieved
Your file as facts, never as law.
- Case material uploaded against the matter
- Attachments inform the argument, never the citation
- The refusal path stays in place
The firm owns the law it relies on.
- Starter corpus ships read-only
- Firm additions gated to administrators
- Per-matter case law proposals, scored for relevance
ROC form. Indexed. Editable.
- Reads the documents already on the matter
- Lettered sections with legal descriptions, not filenames
- Entitulement cover and index of documents
Rules never run through a model
Computed from the Rules of Court 2012. Deterministic. Explicit when no rule exists.
Verified before they go live
Every rule is checked against its statutory source by a named practising litigator before it is used, and each verification is locked to one rule at one version. Amend the rule and it must be verified again. The verifier's name and the date appear against every date the system produces.
matter 2026/0001 · Tan Mei Ling v. Lim Holdings Sdn. Bhd.
input writ served 10 Sep 2026
rule ROC 2012 O.12 r.4 -> appearance within 14 days
rule ROC 2012 O.18 r.2 -> defence 14 days after appearance
verify rule confirmed against the statute by a practitioner
result defence due 24 Sep 2026 · severity procedural
gap no rule configured for extension · shown, never estimated
audit written 09:42 · Associate · matter 2026/0001
Verify
A practitioner confirms the rule against the statute. Nothing computes from an unverified rule.
Open
Court, suit, parties. Conflicts run.
Apply
Windows derived from the rule.
Escalate
Liberty · procedural · compliance.
Audit
Every override, logged.
Built to be audited
Confidentiality is a professional obligation before it is a feature.
Tenant isolation
Every read and write is scoped to the firm in the data layer, and audit queries fail closed.
PDPA breach workflow
Detection, severity and containment tracked against a 72-hour clock, with the reasoning recorded.
Immutable audit
Access and change written to a log tied to the matter and the user. Exportable for an auditor.
Role separation
Eight firm roles plus separate platform roles, guarded at the route rather than the menu.
Designed to sit alongside your systems
On the roadmap Planned - not yet available
LexIQ exports to your existing accounting and practice systems rather than replacing them.
LexIQ prepares filings for the court e-Filing System. It never holds your digital certificate and never files on your behalf - you sign and you lodge.
Specified by people who have done the filing
Legal and regulatory technology, Kuala Lumpur
Wintech Advisory Sdn. Bhd. builds the systems that carry contracts, compliance and, now, litigation.
Regulatory advisory
Fintech and technology companies
Contract automation
Repositories that survive an audit
Compliance frameworks
ISO 27001 · PCI DSS · PDPA · AML/CFT
Training
For technology teams and advisers
Asked first
Where the product is
LexIQ is in active development with founding firms. We would rather you knew exactly what is finished.
Working today
- Matters, documents and folders
- Conflict checking and KYC
- Criminal matter and custody records
- Hearing diary with clash detection
- Bundle assembly in ROC form
- Research restricted to verified authorities, refusing when none applies
- Tamper-evident audit trail
- English and Bahasa Malaysia
In progress
- Rule tables undergoing practitioner verification
- Limitation periods by cause of action
- Criminal custody clock computation
- Malaysian region hosting
Founding firms see this list updated at every review session.
See it refuse to answer
Ask it something your corpus cannot support. Watch it decline. Then we walk a live matter, end to end.